The two destructions of Sirhind

Sirhind was a great Mughal provincial capital on the Delhi to Lahore road, with gardens, serais, a mint and a large population. It was destroyed twice.

In 1710 Banda Singh Bahadur Ji took and sacked it after Chappar Chiri. It recovered partially under later Mughal and Afghan governors.

In January 1764 the Dal Khalsa took it again, killed the governor Zain Khan, and levelled it. The tradition holds that the Sikhs pulled the bricks down by hand, and that a Sikh passing through Sirhind was expected to take a brick out of a wall.

The town never recovered. What is there now is Fatehgarh Sahib, built around the site of the Sahibzade's martyrdom, plus the tomb of Mujaddid Alf Sani, Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi, which is a major Naqshbandi shrine and draws pilgrims from Afghanistan and central Asia.

A Mughal capital was deliberately unbuilt as an act of memory, and the ground it stood on is now a Sikh commemorative complex and a Sufi shrine side by side.

The town was taken and destroyed by Banda Singh Bahadur Ji in 1710 after Chappar Chiri, and again in 1764 by the Dal Khalsa, when it was systematically demolished.

What is at the site now is a spread of brick debris under fields and modern building, with the Rauza Sharif and the gurdwaras standing in it.

A Mughal provincial capital lies under the ground of one district and has never been excavated. What was destroyed twice is still there, a metre down.

What we don't know

  • How much of the Mughal city survives archaeologically under the present ground.

Where to check this

  1. Punjab district gazetteer material for Fatehgarh Sahib. Punjab district gazetteers and settlement reports (Internet Archive) ↗

This page has not yet been read through by the editor. Treat it with more caution than the rest.

How this page was written. The text is compiled from the standard published histories and reference works, not from a document held in hand. Nobody from this project has visited the place or read the archive. The list above is where a reader can go to check it, not a record of what was consulted line by line. Dates and figures are the received account. If you hold something better, write in and it will be corrected.

This is one of 67 accounts in The Khalsa Raj, the chapter of this site covering the eighteenth century, from Banda Singh Bahadur Ji to the misls.