What the Gurmukhi on a signboard says

Punjab's road signs are trilingual by rule: Punjabi in Gurmukhi first, then Hindi, then English. Enforcement is uneven and the order is frequently reversed.

The Punjab Official Language Act and its amendments require Punjabi on signboards and in government work, and periodic drives have painted over English-only signs.

The transliteration of Punjabi place names into English on those signs is inconsistent: the same village appears as three spellings on three signs, and the census, the revenue record and the road sign disagree.

That inconsistency is a practical obstacle to everything on this site: searching for a place in an archive requires guessing which spelling a clerk used.

A standard transliteration exists and is not applied.

Anyone building a database of Punjab places has to solve this first, and every project that has tried has solved it separately and differently.

The same village appears as Chak, Chack and Chuck in different records. District names have official spellings that the signboards do not follow, and Nawanshahr, Nawashahr and Nawan Shehar all appear on state signage.

The problem compounds when a Gurmukhi name is transliterated into English by one office and back into Gurmukhi by another, because the round trip does not return the original.

The census, the revenue record and the postal department each keep their own name lists and the three do not reconcile. Anyone matching a village across two of them does it by hand.

What we don't know

  • A standard concordance of Punjabi place name spellings. There is none.

Where to check this

  1. Census of India village directories. Census of India 2011 - Punjab district census handbooks ↗

Named but not linked. These are real, findable documents. This project has not consulted them for this page.

  • Punjab Official Language Act and amendments.

This page has not yet been read through by the editor. Treat it with more caution than the rest.

How this page was written. The text is compiled from the standard published histories and reference works, not from a document held in hand. Nobody from this project has visited the place or read the archive. The list above is where a reader can go to check it, not a record of what was consulted line by line. Dates and figures are the received account. If you hold something better, write in and it will be corrected.

This is one of 62 accounts in What the Voice Carried, the chapter of this site covering the poetry, the music and the oral tradition.