Punjab on film

The documentary record of Punjab is thin and most of it is about six subjects: Partition, 1984, drugs, farmers, emigration and the Golden Temple.

There is very little documentary film about Punjabi agriculture as a working system, about the crafts, about the melas, about the villages, or about the ordinary life of the state.

The films that exist are largely made by outsiders for outside audiences, which shapes what they look for.

Gurvinder Singh's feature films, Anhe Ghore Da Daan and Chauthi Koot, adapted from Gurdial Singh and Waryam Singh Sandhu, are the strongest cinematic treatments of rural Punjab and the militancy years, and both were made on very little money.

Punjabi commercial cinema is large, profitable and almost entirely comedy and family drama for the diaspora market.

A phone shoots better video than a professional camera did twenty years ago. The equipment problem is solved and the record is still not being made.

The documentary record is thin and scattered. Films exist on the Ghadar movement, on Partition, on the farm protests and on the water, and they are made mostly by individuals without institutional backing.

The government film material from the 1950s to the 1980s holds footage of the Bhakra construction, the Green Revolution and the reorganisation, and it is the largest single film archive of the state.

Almost nothing shot in Punjab in the 1980s and 1990s by news organisations has been made accessible. That decade is the least filmed and the most argued about.

What we don't know

  • A catalogue of documentary film about Punjab. There is none.

Where to check this

Named but not linked. These are real, findable documents. This project has not consulted them for this page.

  • Filmographies of Punjabi cinema and documentary.

This page has not yet been read through by the editor. Treat it with more caution than the rest.

How this page was written. The text is compiled from the standard published histories and reference works, not from a document held in hand. Nobody from this project has visited the place or read the archive. The list above is where a reader can go to check it, not a record of what was consulted line by line. Dates and figures are the received account. If you hold something better, write in and it will be corrected.

This is one of 62 accounts in What the Voice Carried, the chapter of this site covering the poetry, the music and the oral tradition.